英語辯論賽辯論稿（精選3篇）

英語辯論賽辯論稿 篇1

Good morning y I’m happy to make a discussion about paper book and E-book with you. After our team seriously thinking and discussion,we agree that paper book is still the first s

election when people decide to read.經過我們團隊認真思考和討論，大家一致認

為，紙書依然是當人們決定要讀取的第一個選擇。

That means,though E-book has appeared for many years and its market is growing rapidly,paper book still occupy the first place.這意味着，儘管電子圖書已經出現了許多

年，其市場正很快，紙質書仍然佔據第一的位置。

Therefore,our group choose to support paper compared with E-book, paper book has its natural advantages.因此，我們小組選擇支持的紙質書。當與電子書相

比，紙書有其天然的優勢。

Firstly,traditional culture take paper book as its carrier,this also makes traditional reading has become a habit for most people.首先，傳統文化採取紙質圖書為載體，這也

使得傳統閲讀對大多數人來説已經成為一種習慣。

We all know that once a habit developed,it will be hard to change.我們都知道，一旦習

慣開發的，這將是很難改變。

It also illustrates that the status of paper book is still hard to shake by E-book and the soul and essence of paper book are also impossible to be replaced by E-book.這也説

明瞭紙書的地位還是難以通過電子書來動搖靈魂和紙書的精華，也不可能被電子書取代。

Traditional reading helps us cultivate abstract thinking ability,by contrast,E-book looks like a kind of fast food culture which lacks of depth and aftertaste.傳統的閲讀能

幫助我們培養抽象思維能力，相比之下，電子書看起來就像是一種快餐文化，而缺乏深度和 回味。

Secondly,E-book isn’t really conductive to collection,collection of books is also a kind of collection of culture and a historical accumulation at the same time.其次，電子書是

不是真的利於收藏，收藏的書籍也是一種集文化，並在同一時間一個歷史積澱。

So,one day in the future,if what we can see in museum is not ancient books but electronic readers,such as kindle,CD,removing storage devices,don’t tell me that you still have interesting to visit.於是，有一天，在未來，如果我們能在博物館看到的是不是古

代的書籍，但電子閲讀器，如點燃，CD，刪除存儲設備，不要告訴我，你還有興趣訪問。

So,as far as I’m concerned,a electronic reader is always a cold machine,it cann’t bring us warm feeling like paper book.所以， 就我而言， 一個電子閲讀器始終是一個冰冷的機器，

它無法帶給我們像紙書温暖的感覺。

To sum up,we choose to support paper book is a right choice. 綜上所述， 我們選擇支持

紙書是一個正確的選擇。

英語辯論賽辯論稿 篇2

Good evening，Ladies and gentlemen.

According to the law, every single individual is born with the right to keep living. Since death is just a part of life, to suggest that it is a right is to grant that it is a freedom to decide when and where to give up this kind of right. In a manner of speaking, it is a man’s right to commit suicide.

Again, we can find in the OXFord Advanced Learner’s English-Chinese dictionary the explanation of “suicide”----the act of killing oneself intentionally----which indicates that suicide is simply a libertarian movement for human freedom and the right of making choices. It is the law’s duty to protect human’s freedom and the right of making choices.

While it is without doubt that suicide, in reality, is human’s right, there main argument remain:

1,Maybe some people will say that the primary purpose of human being is to live, so suicide is inhumane and totally against the standard of ethic;

2,Suicide is criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person;

3,The people who commits suicide is irrespondsable to those who love him, even if it is a physical and mental realse to himself.

However, an evidence to sustain the first argument is difficult to is common sense to note that Modern medicine has its own limitation and can not cure all the existing spite of the extraordinary progress made in Modern medicine, problems remain in terms of guaranteeing that all the pains due to illness can be reduced to a tolerant level. As a result of this, at least in the near future, there must be some illnesses which can not be treated, some pains which are uncontrollable, some people who are terminally ill. Maybe the primary purpose of an ordinary and healthy human being is to live, but what if the person we are talking about is a terminally ill patient whose remaining time is no more than a series of suffering . Neither the law nor medical ethics requires “everything be done” to keep a person alive. However, insistnece, against the patient’s wishes, that death be postponed by every means available is contrary to law and practice. It would also be cruel and inhumane. There comes a time when continued attempts to cure are not compassionate, wise or medically sound. That’s where only euthanasia can be of use. Voluntary euthanasia,which is another form of suicide, is human, because it brings mental and physical release to the patient and his family and helps to put an ultimate end to the torment of a termnally ill patient by hastening his death when he has no prospect of recovering. Extending an incurably sick patient’s life means the same as aggravating the pain . It is unnecessory to maintain life artificially beyond the point when people will never regain consciousness. Because effort should not be made to perpetuate what has become a meanless existence.

Others may argue that “suicide is criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person”. Indeed, killing another person is a kind of serious criminal offense which we call “murder”. However, what we are talkig about is “suicide”, not “murder”. Do they realise there is a big difference between the lives of our own and the lives of other people? Since it is our own life, we have the right to decide in what way the life meets its end. If not ,what is the difference gonna be? For instance, you are guity of keeping other people’s possession without permition. Because you are stealing the things which do not belong to you. But when it comes to your own possession, that it is to say, when you keep your own possession or even use it in a way that will probably destroy it,no one would consider you as , Sustaining the idea of “suicide is criminal offense” is as ridiculous as saying that a person is guity of using his own possession in a destructive way. In the case of suicide, there is no victims, let alone the so-called criminal offense.

With regard to the last argument----”the people who commit suicide ,even if it is a physical and mental realse to himself, is irresponsable to the people who really love him”----the argument itself, ironically is in some sense to abmit that suicide is a physical and mental realse. But what they fail to realise is that the kind of release is not just to the one who commit suicide, but also to his is a terminally sick patient’s right as well as duty to put an utimate end to the torment of himself and his family. Because he is the reason of all the suffering. Those who choose suicide are a class of people whose remaining time is nothing but simply suffering, a class of people who choose death as an ultimate escape from the eternal torture they are destined to ,a class of people who need compassion and understanding from their relatives and the society, rather than meanlessly prolonging his painful life. If we really love the one who commit suicide, we should let him die in a desired way, die with dignity as he wishes. Because this is where true love lies.

Judging from what has been discussed above, we can safely draw the conclusion that we should make suicide legalized. Because it’s a new and bitter truth we must learn to face.

That’s k you.

英語辯論賽辯論稿 篇3

謝謝主席,大家好!

桔生淮南則為桔，桔生淮北則為枳。我方的觀點是順境更有利於人成才。且聽我作如下的兩點分析。

第一，從概念方面説：人活着總處在一定的社會環境和自然環境中，當這樣的環境為我們成才的方方面面都設置了很好的條件，有利於我們主觀能動性的發揮時，這種環境就是順境。當我們生活在不論維持生存還是成就事業總感到困難重重，壓抑苦悶時，這種環境就是逆境。

順境中，給您克服這個困難提供了有利的保障。比如説我們有良師益友的指導，平時為我們諄諄教誨，為我們善言，來提醒我們哪些疏漏;比如説良好的物質條件，良好的生活環境，這些呢，都為我們克服這個困難提供了有利的條件。一個好漢三個幫和眾叛親離，哪個更有利於人的成才呢?

第二,從社會方面説,魯迅曾説，天才的出現，不僅需要天才的種子，而且更要適宜天才生長的土壤。人是一切社會關係的總和。一個人的成才與否，不僅與他的主觀努力有關，而且與他所處的社會經濟環境有關，諸葛亮成為千古人龍沒有劉玄德三顧茅廬是不可思議的，曹雪芹登上中國古典文學的頂峯，沒有他青少年時期的良好教育是不可能的。

歷史上,讓我們記憶猶新的“文革時期”，這段時期的社會環境顯然可以稱之為逆境，是這樣的環境更有利於人成才嗎?答案是否定的。輕視教育，輕視人才的社會風氣，使成才主體的智慧和才能沒有施展、發揮的餘地，他們怎樣成才?然而，改革開放，“尊重知識、尊重人才”，人才成長和發揮作用有了適宜的環境，也就是順境。如果沒有這樣的順境，許多人成才成果的美麗夢想也只能是夢想，不會實現。

為了讓更多的人不再生活在逆境中，無數革命英雄拋頭顱，灑熱寫作通:血，甚至連自己的身家性命都不顧，也要為大家爭來一個生活發展的順境。 假如今天我們為不能生逢亂世而遺憾，如果泉下有知，真不知會作何感想。如果説“逆境有利於人才成長，那麼這些偉人，他們在歷史上的過錯可真是無法計量的!真可謂是千古罪人!”

從教育這一行來説，綜觀世界各國,重視教育投入的國家國民素質就高，重視科研投入的科技成果就多。哈佛大學經濟系居世界第一，為什麼?主要因為哈佛有一流的教授、雄厚的財力，嚴格的制度保障等一切先決條件保證了哈佛學子獨佔熬頭。

我國教育大到國家政策，小到學校的策略，都非常重視人力、物力的投資，國家自改革開放以來，加大教育投資，教育界人才輩出，我國的教育也走在了世界前列。並且我們還向貧困地區捐款助學，創辦了許多希望國小，就是為了給那些因逆境而失學的兒童創造上學的條件，也是因為領導、教育家、有愛心的人都堅信 順境更有利於人成才即我方觀點。

好風憑藉力，助我上青雲。憑藉順境的好風，我們可以展開成才的雙翼，在人生的天際飛得更高，更遠。